Образование: МПГУ им. В.И. Ленина (Исторический факультет) 2005 г. – кандидат политических наук. Тема диссертации: «Становление и эволюция испанской модели демократии: основные факторы и направления» (23.00.02) Сфера научных интересов: внешняя и внутренняя политика Болгарии внешняя и внутренняя политика Румынии российско-болгарские и российско-румынские отношения европейская интеграция Болгарии и Румынии политика ЕС в Болгарии и Румынии болгарско-американские и румыно-американские отношения Приднестровский конфликт Молдавия и молдавско-румынские отношения Иностранный язык: английский Профиль автора в Science Index
Education: 2000 – Graduated from the V.I. Lenin Moscow State Pedagogical University (Department of History) 2005 – PhD in Political Science at IMEMO. D. thesis: "Formation and Evolution of the Spanish Model of Democracy: Main Factors and Directions" (23.00.02) Fields of scientific interests: Bulgaria's foreign and domestic policy Romania's foreign and domestic policy Russian-Bulgarian and Russian-Romanian relations European integration of Bulgaria and Romania EU policy in Bulgaria and Romania Bulgarian-American and Romanian-American relations Transdniestrian conflict Moldova and Moldovan-Romanian relations Foreign languages : English
В статье исследуются причины повышенного внимания немецких политиков к проблемам Приднестровья. Рассмотрена история приднестровского конфликта и причины, способствующие его длительности. Изучена роль Германии в попытках разрешения противоречий этого региона. Раскрыта связь заинтересованности ФРГ в приднестровском урегулировании с традицией “новой восточной политики”, заложенной В. Брандтом, а также с возросшими амбициями Берлина в вопросах обеспечения безопасности ЕС. Определены проистекающие из сложившейся ситуации вызовы для России.
In recent years Germany's foreign policy has undergone significant changes. German policymakers are mainly focusing on strengthening the European Union political unity and enhancing its influence. In this regard, relations with the CEE countries and the former Soviet republics have become crucial. Russia is no longer considered to be Germany’s “strategic partner” and is now seen in Berlin as one of the risks to the European security. Germany seeks to take more responsibility for what is happening both inside and outside the EU. Since 2009, Berlin has been making efforts to resolve the Transnistrian conflict. In 2016, German policymakers managed to resume the negotiations interrupted 10 years earlier and achieve tangible results. Chisinau and Tiraspol have implemented the five points of the Berlin Protocol: settled the problems of vehicle registration and license plates for international transportation; reached an agreement regarding the possession of agricultural land in the left Bank area; ensured the functioning of the Latin-script schools in Transnistria; initiated the apostilization of the Transniestrian University diplomas and the opening of a bridge across the Dniester River. Further implementation of these points will create basic conditions for the final settlement of the conflict. The article analyses the reasons than caused the Transnistrian conflict to attract close attention of German policymakers. The author reveals the connection of Germany's interest in the Transnistrian settlement with the tradition of the “new Eastern policy” laid down by V. Brandt, as well as with Germany's increased ambitions to act as a EU informal leader in security matters. A special focus is given to the history of the issue, the causes of the ongoing unresolved conflict and the analysis of German actions aimed at resolving the contradictions in Transnistria. About author: Ekaterina V. SHUMITSKAYA, Cand. Sci. (Polit. Sci.), Senior Researcher , Sector of Political Aspects of European Integration, Department of European Political Studies .
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.