afjournal Анализ и прогноз. Журнал ИМЭМО РАН Analysis & Forecasting. Journal of IMEMO 2713-170X ИМЭМО РАН 10.20542/afij-2026-1-26-39 QHAVEG Research Article Статьи Рейтинги ответственного бизнеса: особенности и тенденции развития Responsible Business Ratings: Features and Development Trends ВУКОВИЧ Наталья Анатольевна, кандидат экономических наук, доцент департамента мировой экономики факультета мировой экономики и мировой политики, академический руководитель лаборатории ответственного бизнеса. Национальный исследовательский университет “Высшая школа экономики”, РФ, 109074 Москва, Славянская пл., 4, стр. 2 ( nvukovich @ hse . ru ) , ORCID : 0000-0002-4593-2835 АВЕРИНА Анна Олеговна, стажер-исследователь лаборатории ответственного бизнеса. Национальный исследовательский университет “Высшая школа экономики”, РФ, 109074 Москва, Славянская пл., 4, стр. 2 ( aoaverina @ edu . hse . ru ) , ORCID : 0009-0007-9360-5517 СТЕФАНОВА Кристина Алексеевна, стажер-исследователь лаборатории ответственного бизнеса. Национальный исследовательский университет “Высшая школа экономики”, РФ, 109074 Москва, Славянская пл., 4, стр. 2 ( kastefanova @ edu . hse . ru ) , ORCID : 0009-0004-6320-6927 Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs, School of World Economy, Laboratory of Responsible Business, National Research University ‘Higher School of Economics’, 4/2, Moscow, Slavyanskaya square, Moscow 109074, Russian Federation Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs, School of World Economy, Laboratory of Responsible Business, National Research University ‘Higher School of Economics’, 4/2, Moscow, Slavyanskaya square, Moscow 109074, Russian Federation Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs, School of World Economy, Laboratory of Responsible Business, National Research University ‘Higher School of Economics’, 4/2, Moscow, Slavyanskaya square, Moscow 109074, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4593-2835 Вукович Наталья Анатольевна https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9360-5517 Аверина Анна Олеговна https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6320-6927 Стефанова Кристина Алексеевна 14 06 2026 1 26 39 © ВУКОВИЧ Н.А., АВЕРИНА А.О., СТЕФАНОВА К.А., 2026 Поступила в редакцию 03.03.2025. После доработки 01.07.2025. Принята к публикации 25.02.2026. © Natalia А. VUKOVIC, Anna О. AVERINA, Kristina А. STEFANOVA, 2026 Received 03.03.2025. Revised 01.07.2025. Accepted 25.02.2026. 2026 Вукович Н.А., Аверина А.О., Стефанова К.А. Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. https://www.afjournal.ru/2026/1/development-trends-and-risks/responsible-business-ratings-features-and-development-trends

Ответственное ведение бизнеса и политика в области охраны окружающей среды, социальной защиты и управления ( environmental, social, governance – ESG ) играют решающую роль в продвижении глобальной повестки в области устойчивого развития. Поскольку компании по всему миру интегрируют устойчивое развитие в свои стратегические рамки, рейтинги ESG служат ключевыми инструментами для оценки корпоративной ответственности и принятия инвестиционных решений. В данной статье проводится сравнительный анализ основных международных рейтингов ESG с наибольшим числом участников, освещаются глобальные тенденции в области ответственного ведения бизнеса и устойчивого развития. В исследовании рассматриваются известные рейтинговые системы ESG , включая S & P , CDP , LSEG , MSCI , FTSE Russell и российский рейтинг ответственного бизнеса ЭКГ, выявляются ключевые сходства и различия в их методологиях и областях применения. Один из наиболее важных выводов исследования – преобладание экологических показателей в международных рейтингах ESG , отражающих глобальный акцент на смягчении последствий изменения климата, сокращении углеродного следа и эффективности использования ресурсов. Национальный рейтинг ESG России, ЭКГ-рейтинг, напротив, уделяет повышенное внимание социальным показателям, придавая им существенный вес в корпоративных оценках. Это различие подчеркивает разницу в региональных приоритетах в оценке устойчивости, на которые влияют экономические, нормативные и социальные условия. Уникальной особенностью ЭКГ-рейтинга является его модель бесплатного участия, которая позволяет компаниям проходить оценку без финансовых барьеров. Кроме того, в нем используются проверенные данные, предназначенные для государственных служб и предоставленные ими, что повышает надежность и прозрачность оценок. Результаты этого исследования способствуют пониманию глобальной практики оценки ESG и ее влияния на корпоративную стратегию. Анализируя различные рейтинговые методологии, это исследование дает ценную информацию компаниям, стремящимся совершенствовать свою политику в области устойчивого развития и привести ее в соответствие с лучшими международными практиками. Результаты могут быть использованы при разработке более комплексных стратегий ESG , для совершенствования национальных и международных рейтинговых методологий и в будущих исследованиях в области устойчивого корпоративного управления.

Responsible business conduct and environmental, social, governance (ESG) policies play a crucial role in advancing the global sustainable development agenda. As businesses worldwide integrate sustainability into their strategic frameworks, ESG ratings serve as key instruments for assessing corporate responsibility and guiding investment decisions. This paper conducts a comparative analysis of major international ESG ratings with the largest number of participants, highlighting global trends in responsible business conduct and sustainability performance. The study examines prominent ESG rating systems, including S&P, CDP, LSEG, MSCI, FTSE Russell, and the Russian EPS rating of responsible business, identifying key similarities and differences in their methodologies and focus areas. One of the most significant findings of this research is the predominance of environmental indicators in international ESG ratings, reflecting a global emphasis on climate change mitigation, carbon footprint reduction and resource efficiency. In contrast, the national ESG rating of Russia, the EPS-rating, places a stronger emphasis on social indicators, assigning them the highest weight in corporate assessments. This distinction underscores varying regional priorities in sustainability assessment, influenced by economic, regulatory, and social contexts. A unique feature of the EPS-rating is its free participation model, which allows companies to be evaluated without financial barriers. Additionally, it leverages high-quality, objective data sourced directly from government services, enhancing the reliability and transparency of assessments. The findings of this study contribute to the understanding of global ESG evaluation practices and their implications for corporate strategy. By analyzing diverse rating methodologies, this research offers valuable insights for companies seeking to enhance their sustainability policies and align with international best practices. The results can be applied in the development of more comprehensive ESG strategies, the refinement of national and international rating methodologies, and future research on sustainable corporate governance.

 компании ответственное ведение бизнеса устойчивое развитие ESG ESG-рейтинг рейтинги ответственного бизнеса companies responsible business conduct sustainable development ESG ESG- rating ratings of responsible business UDK 334.72+005.35+303 References Шеина А.Ю., Брусенцова Л.С., Назарова Э.Р. Повышение эффективности взаимодействия государства, бизнеса и общества на региональном уровне за счет внедрения ESG-концепции (на примере ПАО “НЕФАЗ”). Сибирская финансовая школа , 2023, № 4, с. 128-133. [Sheina A.Y., Brusentsova L.S., Nazarova E.R. Improving the Efficiency of Interaction Between the State, Business and Society at the Regional Level Through the Introduction of ESG Concept (Using the Example of PJSC NEFAZ). Siberian Financial School , 2023, no. 4, p. 128-133. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.34020/1993-4386-2022-4-128-133 Шеина А.Ю., Брусенцова Л.С., Назарова Э.Р. Повышение эффективности взаимодействия государства, бизнеса и общества на региональном уровне за счет внедрения ESG-концепции (на примере ПАО “НЕФАЗ”). Сибирская финансовая школа , 2023, № 4, с. 128-133. [Sheina A.Y., Brusentsova L.S., Nazarova E.R. Improving the Efficiency of Interaction Between the State, Business and Society at the Regional Level Through the Introduction of ESG Concepts (Using the Example of PJSC NEFAZ). Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola, 2023, no. 4, p. 128-133. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.34020/1993-4386-2022-4-128-133 Hassan M.K., Chiaramonte L., Dreassi A., Paltrinieri A., Piserà S. The Crossroads of ESG and Religious Screening on Firm Risk. Research in International Business and Finance , 2021, vol. 58, 101500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101500 Hassan M.K., Chiaramonte L., Dreassi A., Paltrinieri A., Piserà S. The Crossroads of ESG and Religious Screening on Firm Risk. Research in International Business and Finance , 2021, vol. 58, 101500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101500 Pigou A. The Economics of Welfare . New York, Routledge, 2017. 876 p. Pigou A. The Economics of Welfare . New York, Routledge, 2017. 876 p. Burton I. Report on Reports: Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development , 1987, vol. 29 , no. 5, p. 25-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1987.9928891 Burton I. Report on Reports: Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development , 1987, vol. 29 , no. 5, p. 25-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1987.9928891 Rowley T.J. Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. Academy of Management Review , 1997, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 887-910. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107 Rowley T.J. Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. Academy of Management Review , 1997, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 887-910. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107 Latapí Agudelo M.A., Jóhannsdóttir L., Davídsdóttir B. A Literature Review of the History and Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 2019, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y Latapí Agudelo M.A., Jóhannsdóttir L., Davídsdóttir B. A Literature Review of the History and Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 2019, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y Gutterman A.S. Responsible Business: A Guide to Corporate Social Responsibility for Sustainable Entrepreneurs. Oakland , Sustainable Entrepreneurship Project, 2019. 571 p. Gutterman A.S. Responsible Business: A Guide to Corporate Social Responsibility for Sustainable Entrepreneurs. Oakland , Sustainable Entrepreneurship Project, 2019. 571 p. Carroll A.B. Carroll’s Pyramid of CSR: Taking Another Look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2016, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6 Carroll A.B. Carroll’s Pyramid of CSR: Taking Another Look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2016, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6 Gray T. Investing for the Environment? The Limits of the UN Principles of Responsible Investment . SSRN. 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1416123 Gray T. Investing for the Environment? The Limits of the UN Principles of Responsible Investment . SSRN. 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1416123 Стародубцева Е.Б., Траченко М.Б. ESG -развитие российских компаний: ориентир на рынки Азиатско-Тихоокеанского региона и Ближнего Востока. Вестник университета , 2023, № 5, с. 105-112. [Starodubtseva E.B., Trachenko M.B. ESG Development of Russian Companies: А Focus on the Markets of the Asian-Pacific Region and the Middle East. Vestnik universiteta , 2023, no. 5, p. 105-112. (In Russ.)] https :// doi . org /10.26425/1816-4277-2023-5-105-112 Стародубцева Е.Б., Траченко М.Б. ESG-развитие российских компаний: ориентир на рынки Азиатско-Тихоокеанского региона и Ближнего Востока. Вестник университета , 2023, № 5, с. 105-112. [Starodubtseva E.B., Trachenko M.B. ESG Development of Russian Companies: A Focus on the Markets of the Asian-Pacific Region and the Middle East. Vestnik universiteta , 2023, no. 5, p. 105-112. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-5-105-112 Казанцев В.П., Гончарова К.С. Эволюция принципов ESG в контексте стратегии устойчивого развития: основные этапы и направления. Вестник Тихоокеанского государственного университета, 2024, № 2(73), c. 109-118. [Kazantsev V.P., Goncharova K.S. Evolution of ESG Principles in the Context of a Sustainable Development Strategy: Main Stages and Directions. Vestnik Tihookeanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta-Bulletin of the Pacific State University , 2024, no. 2 (73), p. 109-118. (In Russ.)] DOI: https://doi.org/10.38161/1996-3440-2024-2-109-118 Казанцев В.П., Гончарова К.С. Эволюция принципов ESG в контексте стратегии устойчивого развития: основные этапы и направления. Вестник Тихоокеанского государственного университета, 2024, № 2(73), c. 109-118. [Kazantsev V.P., Goncharova K.S. Evolution of ESG Principles in the Context of a Sustainable Development Strategy: Main Stages and Directions. Vestnik Tihookeanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta-Bulletin of the Pacific State University , 2024, no. 2 (73), p. 109–118. (In Russ.)] DOI: https://doi.org/10.38161/1996-3440-2024-2-109-118 Lubberink R., Blok V., Van Ophem J., Omta O. Lessons for Responsible Innovation in the Business Context: A Systematic Literature Review of Responsible, Social and Sustainable Innovation Practices. Sustainability , 2017, vol. 9, no. 5, 721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050721 Lubberink R., Blok V., Van Ophem J., Omta O. Lessons for Responsible Innovation in the Business Context: A Systematic Literature Review of Responsible, Social and Sustainable Innovation Practices. Sustainability , 2017, vol. 9, no. 5, 721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050721 Котова В.А., Середина М.И. ESG-трансформация и устойчивое развитие: современные тенденции. Инновационная наука , 2024, № 1-2, c. 80-85. [Kotova V.A., Seredina M.I. ESG Transformation and Sustainable Development: Current Trends. Innovacionnaya nauka , 2024, no. 1-2, p. 80-85. (In Russ.)] Available at: https://aeterna-ufa.ru/sbornik/IN-2024-01-2.pdf (accessed 04.02.2025). Котова В.А., Середина М.И. ESG-трансформация и устойчивое развитие: современные тенденции. Инновационная наука , 2024, № 1-2, cc. 80-85. [Kotova V.A., Seredina M.I. ESG Transformation and Sustainable Development: Current Trends. Innovacionnaya nauka , 2024, no. 1-2, p. 80-85. (In Russ.)] Available at: https://aeterna-ufa.ru/sbornik/IN-2024-01-2.pdf (accessed 04.02.2025). Zhao L., Yang M.M., Wang Z., Michelson G. Trends in the Dynamic Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Leadership: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics , 2023, vol. 182, no. 1, p. 135-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05035-y Zhao L., Yang M.M., Wang Z., Michelson G. Trends in the Dynamic Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Leadership: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics , 2023, vol. 182, no. 1, p. 135-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05035-y Teymurova V., Huseynli I., Miethlich B. Operation of Organizations and Their Relationship to Corporate Responsibility. Public Organization Review, 2024, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-023-00724-2 Teymurova V., Huseynli I., Miethlich B. Operation of Organizations and Their Relationship to Corporate Responsibility. Public Organization Review, 2024, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-023-00724-2 Mougenot B., Doussoulin J.P. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): Global Trends in Developed and Developing Countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability , 2024, vol. 26, no. 3, p. 6543-6560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02974-y Mougenot B., Doussoulin J.P. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): Global Trends in Developed and Developing Countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability , 2024, vol. 26, no. 3, p. 6543-6560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02974-y Friske W., Nikolov A.N., Morgan T. Making the Grade: An Analysis of Sustainability Reporting Standards and Global Reporting Initiative Adherence Ratings. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 2024, vol. 31, no. 3, p. 2098-2108. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2686 Friske W., Nikolov A.N., Morgan T. Making the Grade: An Analysis of Sustainability Reporting Standards and Global Reporting Initiative Adherence Ratings. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 2024, vol. 31, no. 3, p. 2098-2108. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2686 Bowen H.R. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman . Iowa City, University of Iowa Press, 2013. 248 p. https://doi.org/10.1353/book29080 Bowen H.R. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman . Iowa City, University of Iowa Press, 2013. 248 p. https://doi.org/10.1353/book29080 Wirba A.V. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of Government in Promoting CSR. Journal of the Knowledge Economy , 2024, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 7428-7454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01185-0 Wirba A.V. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of Government in Promoting CSR. Journal of the Knowledge Economy , 2024, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 7428-7454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01185-0 Agafonova A., Yakhneeva I., Nikitina I. Corporate Social Responsibility in Russia: Motives and Features. Mantulenko V., ed. Global Challenges and Prospects of the Modern Economic Development . European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2019, vol. 57, p. 1055-1068. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.03.105 Agafonova A., Yakhneeva I., Nikitina I. Corporate Social Responsibility in Russia: Motives and Features. Mantulenko V., ed. Global Challenges and Prospects of the Modern Economic Development . European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2019, vol. 57, p. 1055-1068. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.03.105 Larcker D.F., Pomorski L., Tayan B., Watts E.M. ESG Ratings: A Compass Without Direction. Stanford Closer Look Series, 2022, p. 1-16. Larcker D.F., Pomorski L., Tayan B., Watts E.M. ESG Ratings: A Compass Without Direction. Stanford Closer Look Series, 2022, p. 1-16. Billio M., Costola M., Hristova I., Latino C., Pelizzon L. Inside the ESG Ratings: (Dis)agreement and Performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 2021, vol. 28, no. 5, p. 1426-1445. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2177 Billio M., Costola M., Hristova I., Latino C., Pelizzon L. Inside the ESG Ratings: (Dis)agreement and Performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 2021, vol. 28, no. 5, p. 1426-1445. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2177 Lindström L. Comparative Analysis of ESG Scoring Models: Evaluating Methodologies, Data Sources, and Their Impact on ESG Scores. EnPress , 2024, vol. 8, iss. 12, p. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i12.8641 Lindström L. Comparative Analysis of ESG Scoring Models: Evaluating Methodologies, Data Sources, and Their Impact on ESG Scores. EnPress , 2024, vol. 8, iss. 12, p. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i12.8641 Świniarska O. ESG Rating: Comparative Analysis of Methods Used by Selected Rating Organizations. Kępczak N., Perek-Długosz A., Solarczyk P., eds. National Scientific Conferences 2024: 5th Summer Scientific Online School. Lodz, Promovendi Foundation, 2024, p. 26-28. Available at: https://promovendi.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Abstracts-SummerSchool-2024.pdf (accessed 04.02.2025). Świniarska O. ESG Rating: Comparative Analysis of Methods Used by Selected Rating Organizations. Kępczak N., Perek-Długosz A., Solarczyk P., eds. National Scientific Conferences 2024: 5th Summer Scientific Online School. Lodz, Promovendi Foundation, 2024, p. 26-28. Available at: https://promovendi.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Abstracts-SummerSchool-2024.pdf (accessed 04.02.2025). Chen Y.S., Chang C.H., Wu F.S. Origins of Green Innovations: The Differences Between Proactive and Reactive Green Innovations. Management Decision, 2012, vol. 50, no. 3, p. 368-398. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211216197 Chen Y.S., Chang C.H., Wu F.S. Origins of Green Innovations: The Differences Between Proactive and Reactive Green Innovations. Management Decision, 2012, vol. 50, no. 3, p. 368-398. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211216197 Adams R., Jeanrenaud S., Bessant J., Denyer D., Overy P. Sustainability-Oriented Innovation: a Systematic Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2016, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 180-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068 Adams R., Jeanrenaud S., Bessant J., Denyer D., Overy P. Sustainability-Oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2016, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 180-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068 Evans S., Vladimirova D., Holgado M., et al. Business Model Innovation for Sustainability: Towards a Unified Perspective for Creation of Sustainable Business Models. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2017, vol. 26, no. 5, p. 597-608. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1939 Evans S., Vladimirova D., Holgado M., et al. Business Model Innovation for Sustainability: Towards a Unified Perspective for Creation of Sustainable Business Models. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2017, vol. 26, no. 5, p. 597-608. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1939 Kuzma E., Padilha L.S., Sehnem S., Julkovski D.J., Roman D.J. The Relationship Between Innovation and Sustainability: А Meta-Analytic Study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, vol. 259, 120745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120745 Kuzma E., Padilha L.S., Sehnem S., Julkovski D.J., Roman D.J. The Relationship Between Innovation and Sustainability: A Meta-Analytic Study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, vol. 259, 120745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120745 Wang Z., Chu E., Hao Y. Towards Sustainable Development: How Does ESG Performance Promotes Corporate Green Transformation. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2024, vol. 91, 102982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102982 Wang Z., Chu E., Hao Y. Towards Sustainable Development: How Does ESG Performance Promotes Corporate Green Transformation. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2024, vol. 91, 102982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102982 Голубева В.И., Исмагулов Н., Морару Н., Моргунова О.А. Коммуникативные стратегии корпоративной социальной ответственности в период международных кризисов: стандарты и решения. Коммуникология , 2022, т. 10, № 4, c. 107-119. [Golubeva V.I., Ismagulov N., Moraru N., Morgunova O.A. Communicative Strategies of Corporate Social Responsibility During International Crises: Standards and Solutions. Kommunikologiya , 2022, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 107-119. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-4-107-119 Голубева В.И., Исмагулов Н., Морару Н., Моргунова О.А. Коммуникативные стратегии корпоративной социальной ответственности в период международных кризисов: стандарты и решения. Коммуникология , 2022, т. 10, № 4, cc. 107-119. [Golubeva V.I., Ismagulov N., Moraru N., Morgunova O.A. Communicative Strategies of Corporate Social Responsibility During International Crises: Standards and Solutions. Kommunikologiya , 2022, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 107-119. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-4-107-119 Печегина Т., Вайнер В. Своим путем. Разработка российского Стандарта отчетности об устойчивом развитии и его перспективы. Позитивные изменения , 2024, т. 4, № 1, c. 10-25. [Pechegina T., Weiner V. In Its Own Way. Development of the Russian Sustainability Reporting Standard and Its Prospects. Pozitivnye izmeneniya , 2024, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 10-25. (In Russ.)] Печегина Т., Вайнер В. Своим путем. Разработка российского Стандарта отчетности об устойчивом развитии и его перспективы. Позитивные изменения , 2024, т. 4, № 1, c. 10-25. [Pechegina T., Weiner V. In Its Own Way. Development of the Russian Sustainability Reporting Standard and Its Prospects. Pozitivnye izmeneniya , 2024, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 10-25. (In Russ.)] Багирова А.П., Вавилова А.С., Бледнова Н.Д. Корпоративная демографическая политика как инструмент реализации стратегических интересов государства, бизнеса и персонала. Экономические и социальные перемены : факты , тенденции , прогноз , 2024, т. 17, № 3, с. 137-153. [Bagirova A.P., Vavilova A.S., Blednova N.D. Corporate Demographic Policy as a Tool for Implementing the Strategic Interests of the State, Business and Employees. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast , 2024, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 137-153. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.15838/esc.2024.3.93.8 Багирова А.П., Вавилова А.С., Бледнова Н.Д. Корпоративная демографическая политика как инструмент реализации стратегических интересов государства, бизнеса и персонала. Экономические и социальные перемены : факты , тенденции , прогноз , 2024, т. 17, № 3, с. 137-153. [Bagirova A.P., Vavilova A.S., Blednova N.D. Corporate Demographic Policy as a Tool for Implementing the Strategic Interests of the State, Business and Employees. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast , 2024, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 137-153. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.15838/esc.2024.3.93.8 Багирова А.П., Нешатаев А.В. Российский работодатель как потенциальный субъект влияния на демографическую ситуацию в регионе. AlterEconomics , 2024, т. 21, № 2, c. 268-285. [Bagirova A.P., Neshataev A.V. The Potential Influence of Russian Employers on Regional Demographic Trends. AlterEconomics , 2024, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 268-285. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2024.21-2.6 Багирова А.П., Нешатаев А.В. Российский работодатель как потенциальный субъект влияния на демографическую ситуацию в регионе. AlterEconomics , 2024, т. 21, № 2, c. 268-285. [Bagirova A.P., Neshataev A.V. The Potential Influence of Russian Employers on Regional Demographic Trends. AlterEconomics , 2024, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 268-285. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2024.21-2.6 Chatterji A., Durand R., Levine D., Touboul S. Do Ratings of Firms Converge? Implications for Managers, Investors and Strategy Researchers. Strategic Management Journal , 2016, vol. 37, iss. 8, p. 1597-1614. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2407 Chatterji A., Durand R., Levine D., Touboul S. Do Ratings of Firms Converge? Implications for Managers, Investors and Strategy Researchers. Strategic Management Journal , 2016, vol. 37, iss. 8, p. 1597-1614. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2407 Berg F., Koelbel J., Rigobon R. Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings. Review of Finance , 2022, vol. 26, no. 6, p. 1315-1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033 Berg F., Koelbel J., Rigobon R. Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings. Review of Finance , 2022, vol. 26, no. 6, p. 1315-1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033 Dorfleitner G., Halbritter G., Nguyen M. Measuring the Level and Risk of Corporate Responsibility – An Empirical Comparison of Different ESG Rating Approaches. Journal of Asset Management , 2015, vol. 16, p. 450-466. https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2015.31 Dorfleitner G., Halbritter G., Nguyen M. Measuring the Level and Risk of Corporate Responsibility – An Empirical Comparison of Different ESG Rating Approaches. Journal of Asset Management , 2015, vol. 16, p. 450-466. https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2015.31 Senadheera S., Withana P., Dissanayake P., et al. Scoring Environment Pillar in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Assessment. Sustainable Environment , 2021, vol. 7 , no. 1, 1960097. https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2021.1960097 Senadheera S., Withana P., Dissanayake P., et al. Scoring Environment Pillar in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Assessment. Sustainable Environment , 2021, vol. 7 , no. 1, 1960097. https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2021.1960097 Avetisyan E., Hockerts K. The Consolidation of the ESG Rating Industry as an Enactment of Institutional Retrogression. Business Strategy and the Environment , 2017, vol. 26, no. 3, p. 316-330. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1919 Avetisyan E., Hockerts K. The Consolidation of the ESG Rating Industry as an Enactment of Institutional Retrogression. Business Strategy and the Environment , 2017, vol. 26, no. 3, p. 316-330. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1919

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.